Carbon dating dinosaur fossil
Carbon dating dinosaur fossil - dating for married people ashley
Heavenly Father, thank You for raising up creationists who are uncovering evidence that the Earth is young. I pray that this will cause many people to question and then abandon their belief in evolution.
An article in the spring 2015 edition of the presents never-before-seen carbon dates for 14 different fossils, including a Triceratops and other dinosaurs.
Now, work led by Professor William Schopf, the palaeobiologist who first described the specimens in 1993, has put the matter to rest.
“I think it’s settled,” said Professor Schopf, who is based at the University of California, Los Angeles.
“We have no direct evidence that life existed 4.3 billion years ago but there is no reason why it couldn’t have,” said Professor Valley.
The Upper Triassic Ischigualasto Formation in NW Argentina was deposited in a fluvial system during the synrift filling of the extensional Ischigualasto-Villa Unión Basin.
Nice try, but if this were true, how could it be said that any radiocarbon dating results are accurate?
Evolutionists can't just toss out data they don't like! In this way, they are acting like police officers telling bystanders, "Nothing to see here, folks.
Evolutionists were so sure that dinosaur fossils are too old to contain any carbon-14, they never even bothered to check.
Or perhaps they were afraid of what they would find.
The team also looked at several dozen published carbon-14 results for fossils, wood and coal throughout the geologic column and found radiocarbon in almost 50 samples.
Evolutionists, of course, try to explain it all away by saying the samples were contaminated.
Together with a team of collaborators, Professor Schopf analysed the carbon composition of the ancient rock to find out the ratios of different carbon isotopes – that is, different types of carbon.